Tuesday, November 29, 2005

Certain forces seem determined to kill the religious significance of Christmas, and I, for one, am astounded. But probably not for the reasons the evangelicals are going for.

First, a little background. I spent a (mercifully) brief period of time as a member of the proud American retail sales force. Once hired, my first and most important task was to memorize The Script. The Script was a carefully focus-grouped and company-approved formula that I was paid $5.75 an hour to parrot back at any customer who came within range. Anybody who has worked as a clerk or a "greeter" during the last decade or so has probably memorized the exact same Script, though possibly with a different store/company name inserted.

On the day after Thanksgiving all employees received The Holiday Script. This was a carefully focus-grouped, company-approved, and painstakingly modified version of The Script in which four words at the end were replaced with four new words: "Have A Merry Christmas!"

The original four words in the standard version of The Script were, "Thank you for shopping!"

That's really all that the James Dobsons of the world are accomplishing with their constant harping about some diabolical secularist war on Christmas. See, none of them are bitching about the seasonal greetings they get from librarians or museum ushers or the Shakespeare In The Park troupe. Instead they are fixated on shoving their supposed holy day into the mouths of department store clerks. By demanding that retailers shriek Christmas blessings, the ever-befuddling religious wingers are helping to encourage the public belief that "Christmas" is an alternate pronunciation of "shopping."

Salesdrones recite The Script so many times per day that the words become utterly devoid of any meaning or emotion. Shoppers hear The Script so many times per day that the words become utterly devoid of any meaning or emotion. If, for some reason that completely escapes me, the evangelicals are dead set on making "Merry Christmas" a phrase devoid of any meaning or emotion then I say we let the babies have their freaking bottle. After all, they've already helped us convince a generation of American tots that "Easter" is a type of chocolate, so why stop them now?

5 Comments:

At 6:42 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I recommend Israel. It's the only place I've ever avoided "The Little Drummer Boy" all season long. I thought I was safe in Japan, but no, 5 minutes before my bus came it echoed cruelly through one of those little underground villiages in Kyoto, despoiling my favorite city on Earth. Err ummm Happy Holidays kiddo.

 
At 8:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

PS where's O'Reilly when Christmas really needs him? And speaking of O'Reilly, CF I have responded to your latest posts on

http://www.blogger.com/publish-comment.do?blogID=6316887&postID=113052042433113153&r=ok

and

http://www.blogger.com/publish-comment.do?blogID=6316887&postID=113042049653251245&r=ok


If there are any other threads you would like me to reply on please point them out.

 
At 9:29 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

PPS I'm going to see the Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe twice just to spite you.

 
At 9:29 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

PPS correction: you = Author. I'm going back to bed.

 
At 2:15 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

How about this one? Oh the America a certain 'ilk' have made of us.

CHARLES GIBSON (ABC NEWS): Let me ask you about torture. You said the other day the CIA does not do torture, correct?

PORTER GOSS: That is correct.

GIBSON: How do you define it?

GOSS: Well, I define torture probably the way most people would — in the eye of the beholder. What we do does not come close because torture in terms of inflicting pain or something like that, physical pain or causing a disability, those kinds of things that probably would be a common definition for most Americans, sort of you know it when you see it, we don't do that because it doesn't get what you want. We do debriefings because debriefings are the nature of our business, is to get information. We want accurate information and we want to make sure that we have professional people doing that work, and we do all that, and we do it in a way that does not involve torture because torture is counterproductive.

GIBSON: We [ABC News] reported in the past two weeks about having talked to a number of people who have worked and did work in this agency, about six progressive techniques, each one harsher than the last, to get terrorists to talk, including things like long-term standing up, sleep deprivation, exposure for long periods of time to cold rooms or something called "water-boarding," which involves cellophane over the face and water being poured on an individual. Do those things take place?

GOSS: I've got to say there is a huge amount of disinformation out there on this whole subject because probably there's not very much accurate information available. And the reason there's not very much accurate information available about how we do debriefings and how we deal with people who are in detention is very simply, if we told you how we do that, we would be telling them, and that would lose the edge.

GIBSON: You know what water-boarding is though, right?

GOSS: I know what a lot of things are, but I'm not going to comment.

GIBSON: Would that come under the heading? Would that come under the heading of torture?

GOSS: I don't know. I have—

GIBSON: Well, under your definition that you just gave to me of inflicting pain?

GOSS: Let me put it this way, I'm not going to comment on any individual techniques that anybody has brought forward as an allegation, or dreamed up or anything like that. What we do, as I said many times, is professional, it's lawful, it yields good results and it is not torture.

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=1353449

 

Post a Comment

<< Home