Well, that settles that debate.
Under no circumstances
Harvested squeezings from mirth's most irritated pore
Monday, June 05, 2006
(JavaScript Error)
Previous Posts
- Tip-o-the-hat to Brian, who pointed me toward the ...
- Happy Mark Of The Beast Day!Contrary to what some ...
- I love useless trivia. I'm that kid who knew the ...
- File this one under "Holy Jesus. What are these go...
- Remember, the GOP is the party of fiscal responsib...
- I must be out of the loop. While I often joke abo...
- Over at My Left Wing, there is a graphic diary abo...
- Gotta love The Onion:NEW YORK—Pro-life advocates c...
- According to USA Today, lesbians' brains respond d...
- For your reading pleasure, some quality science wr...
5 Comments:
On the plus side, I guess he's not worried about being in hell.
As one of those pesky theist-types, I have to interject here and say that Divinity does exist, but that natural selection does too :P
You should come to Park sometime this summer, I miss you.
In a classic rematch the best bet was still on lion.
No theologian in the world thinks God cares about Russians. Thanks for the hat tip wench.
Army Manual to Skip Geneva Detainee Rule
The Pentagon's move to omit a ban on prisoner humiliation from the basic guide to soldier conduct faces strong State Dept. opposition.
By Julian E. Barnes, Times Staff Writer
June 5, 2006
WASHINGTON — The Pentagon has decided to omit from new detainee policies a key tenet of the Geneva Convention that explicitly bans "humiliating and degrading treatment," according to knowledgeable military officials, a step that would mark a further, potentially permanent, shift away from strict adherence to international human rights standards.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-torture5jun05,0,877738,full.story?coll=la-home-headlines
PS, excellent response Sarah.
Post a Comment
<< Home